Please criticize :)

[neel]

TRANSITION
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4002/4578539456_e085b2f4c6_o.jpg
....
....
....
....
HOPE
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4051/4573697309_ea76062753_o.jpg
....
....
....
....
Scowling up at destiny
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4072/4570786882_a6e2239bf8_b.jpg
....
....
....
....
GRACE
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4054/4573513011_c4a091c00a_o.jpg

[KrishnenduKes]

Your 2nd photograph is interesting. However your point of interest is the plant in between the ballasts! It could have been a little bit more central and above in the frame. And you also could have cropped part of the washed out sky.

Your third photograph is REALLY Good. Sharp shot, well exposed, good moment captured, nothing to say really. I do not like the caption though. But that is secondary.

Your first photograph does not do much to me!
Nor does the 4th one; I am sure it is the same waterfall that you showcased in your Introduction.

Photo-critique Approved

[Cyclops]

Hi,

My $0.02

1) This image doesn't have any specific appeal & doesn't do justice to the title (IMHO).

2) In this image, as Kenda said, you need to have the subject of your thought in the centre or off center (Rule of 3rds). There is lot of negative space which doesn't enhance or add to the image. Try cropping & editing the image to get a better perspective & result.

3) This is a good portrait of the person & the title for example could have been "Tested by Time" or "Worried about Future". The choice of title also plays a very important role in photography & a wrong word can build or break an image.

4) The waterfall shot is good due to the use of a slow shutter. I like the silky water flow.

[neel]

Your 2nd photograph is interesting. However your point of interest is the plant in between the ballasts! It could have been a little bit more central and above in the frame. And you also could have cropped part of the washed out sky.

Your third photograph is REALLY Good. Sharp shot, well exposed, good moment captured, nothing to say really. I do not like the caption though. But that is secondary.

Your first photograph does not do much to me!
Nor does the 4th one; I am sure it is the same waterfall that you showcased in your Introduction.

Photo-critique Approved


Thanks buddy...

u got it right... the 4th one is the same water fall i showcased before, but this one has some more detailing about the under water stones. Thanks to my polarizer! Although, the water fall shot is kind of 'well executed' rather than 'well thought'. :)

In the contrary, the first shot was more of well thinking to portray the transition period of the dawn. I have tried to keep the lamppost in the frame to convey the feel of the transition.

About the third one, I am quite happy to capture the moment. I will be happier if you suggest some title for that one.

In my thought second one is the best of the lot both in term of thought and execution. I have already cropped a portion from the sky, and will try to crop a bit more to concise the composition.

[neel]

Hi,

My $0.02

1) This image doesn't have any specific appeal & doesn't do justice to the title (IMHO).

2) In this image, as Kenda said, you need to have the subject of your thought in the centre or off center (Rule of 3rds). There is lot of negative space which doesn't enhance or add to the image. Try cropping & editing the image to get a better perspective & result.

3) This is a good portrait of the person & the title for example could have been "Tested by Time" or "Worried about Future". The choice of title also plays a very important role in photography & a wrong word can build or break an image.

4) The waterfall shot is good due to the use of a slow shutter. I like the silky water flow.

Thanks bro!

Looking for few more comments!!

[robin234]

1st picture : nothing much there :though its not bad image .

2.could have been better with some sky ,but top of it is too overexposed for my liking

3.nice portrait .

4.colours are lacking or convert it into black and white ::)