PDA

View Full Version : HDRI: What and How: A Tutorial.


anvancy-(macro analyst)
12-31-2008, 03:24 PM
NOTE : this tutorial is seriously not meant for those who believe that photography should not involve any post processing.its also not for those who dont believe in HDRs or for those who think HDR is cheap.
this tutorial is a rip from my post at photography thread.meant for those who want to involve themselves in this particular field.

NOTE 2 :HDR is an art just like photography.there are two aspects in it.realistic and artistic.i am bent towards the artistic side.which involve painting like effects.so if u do like those,then imply it.otherwise the link carries some interesting stuff about realistic ones. its art.not technique.
like they say,post processing is art.not a technique.through that technique u create art.

for a serious detailed HDR tutorial..with in depth PS technique..visit here.
http://stuckincustoms.com/2006/06/06/548/ u will love it.

mine is a basic starter one.

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3119/2623689671_000fced240.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3202/2464206041_5f8484a7f2.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3241/2783279207_10eb308c4c.jpg


taken straight from wikipedia...explanation of term HDR.

In image processing, computer graphics, and photography, high dynamic range imaging (HDRI) is a set of techniques that allows a greater dynamic range of exposures (the range of values between light and dark areas) than normal digital imaging techniques. The intention of HDRI is to accurately represent the wide range of intensity levels found in real scenes ranging from direct sunlight to shadows.

High Dynamic Range Imaging was originally developed in the 1930s and 1940s by Charles Wyckoff. Wyckoff's detailed pictures of nuclear explosions appeared on the cover of Life magazine in the mid 1940s. The process of tone mapping together with bracketed exposures of normal digital images, giving the end result a high, often exaggerated dynamic range, was first reported in 1993[1], and resulted in a mathematical theory of differently exposed pictures of the same subject matter that was published in 1995[2]. In 1997 this technique of combining several differently exposed images to produce a single HDR image was presented to the computer graphics community by Paul Debevec.

This method was developed to produce a high dynamic range image from a set of photographs taken with a range of exposures. With the rising popularity of digital cameras and easy-to-use desktop software, the term HDR is now popularly used[3] to refer to this process. This composite technique is different from (and may be of lesser or greater quality than) the production of an image from a single exposure of a sensor that has a native high dynamic range. Tone mapping is also used to display HDR images on devices with a low native dynamic range, such as a computer screen.

HDR stands for high dynamic range.you must be knowing that a normal photo has a certain level of shadows and highlights.through HDR you add the details of the shadows and highlights +-EV.you will find def of HDR on wiki and such so do check it out.your +-EV may start from a mere 1/3 and go upto say 3.

speaking equipment wise..the standings in dynamic range.
1 - FujiFilm Finepix S5 Pro (13.5 ev)
2 - FujiFilm Finepix S3 Pro (13.5 ev)
3 - Nikon D90 (12.5 ev)
4 - Sony Alpha 900 (12.3 ev)
5 - Nikon D3 (12.2 ev)
6 - Nikon D700 (12.2 ev)
7 - Nikon D300 (12 ev)
8 - Canon EOS 1Ds mk III (12 ev)
9 - Canon EOS 1D mk III (11.7 ev)
10 - Pentax K10D (11.6 ev)
11 - Sony Alpha 350 (11.5 ev)
12 - Nikon D200 (11.5 ev)
13 - Nikon D40x (11.5 ev)
14 - Canon EOS 50D (11.4 ev)
15 - Konica Minolta DYNAX 5D (11.4 ev)
16 - Nikon D60 (11.4 ev)
17 - Canon EOS 1DS mk II (11.3 ev)
18 - Leica M8 (11.3 ev)
19 - Canon EOS 40D (11.3 ev)
20 - Sony Alpha 100 (11.2 ev)
21 - Samsung GX20 (11.2 ev)
22 - Nikon D80 (11.2 ev)
23 - Canon EOS 1D mk2 N (11.2 ev)
24 - Canon EOS 5D (11.1 ev)
25 - Canon EOS 1D mk2 (11.1 ev)

precise details here..http://www.dxomark.com/

speed is not the only thing that matters.

In HDR unlike normal shots your main factor is not the subject per se but the light that is actually lighting the subject.

.and then you have a total 360degrees of light available for you.that makes 360 shots supported by infinite angles and perspectives at which you can shoot a subject.
say for example..keep an apple in a softbox.place one lamp.start at 0 degrees and end at 360 degrees.and keep on changing the angle.you will find out that from some angles the apple looks better than normal light,in some the apple doesnt look like an apple,in some the apple may look that is impossible to potray.

convert that example into say a car standing in a parking lot and sun rays..falling on it.now you have almost 180degrees of light..considering its a sunny cloudless sky..plus your infinite angles.
so you get how light plays a vital part.

again clouds act as natural diffusers of sun light.as they diffuse they provide smooth lighting to the subject as well as nice atmosphere.combine this with HDR and you get photos that are unique.
example.

if you consider the TATA example look how the light is falling on the indica.part of that light is played by the clouds.they are actually targeting the light to the car while the clouds below is dark.so sort of concentration of light.


but again i am not saying that you cant turn your home theatre photo you took into a HDR.you can ofcourse.or of the window.but an HDR looks beautiful if it has a ray of colors.

now i am coming to the actual HDR shooting.all you need is a camera a tripod and a nice lens.(since you are a DSLR user)preferably a wide angle.since then you can cover more landscape.
shoot using your AEB function of your camera..so find out from your manual and use it.keep the format on RAW.keep your AEB option at +-2EV.this will give you enough details at both the extremes.you can also do a 9 exposure by incrementing your values from 1/3 2/3 + - and so on.first its better you do a 3 exposure.

thats the easy part.now comes the processing part.and many will say use photomatix.i personally use DYNAMIC photo HDR from mediachance.ofcourse its not licenced.you will get it if you know where to search for it.

now the actual tutorial..purposely posting 1024*768 since then the text can be read clearly.

http://i34.tinypic.com/am4cxi.jpg

http://i37.tinypic.com/5yc49h.jpg

http://i35.tinypic.com/x2mnpw.jpg

http://i35.tinypic.com/2e4ddl2.jpg

http://i33.tinypic.com/n54kuf.jpg

http://i35.tinypic.com/314za15.jpg

http://i33.tinypic.com/10cntvk.jpg

http://i34.tinypic.com/2s0jxvt.jpg

http://i38.tinypic.com/4l3s45.jpg

after this u can further process in PS.

sunny can guide on the realistic one tut.involving photomatix.

and using the same technique a same subject 30 HDR experiment.

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3218/3152582041_7468af71aa_b.jpg

hope you people enjoyed it.questions mistakes errors..do point out.

anvancy.

KrishnenduKes
12-31-2008, 04:46 PM
Tutorial Approved

Great thread started there. And some startling photographs. Thanks Anvancy.

We will keep this thread only for HDR tutorial related queries. Methinks that Anvancy here has not done a detailled take on HDR through another popular software: Photomatix. I present an example of one HDR that I managed relatively successfully with Photomatix:

http://i35.tinypic.com/2ih8old.jpg



Once you start using them, you will realise that the two methods give widely varied results. It is upto the user to define his parametres and take a call.

@Anvancy: Maybe you can also do a short one on Photomatix as well. Thanks again.

anvancy-(macro analyst)
12-31-2008, 05:03 PM
Tutorial Approved

Great thread started there. And some startling photographs. Thanks Anvancy.

We will keep this thread only for HDR tutorial related queries. Methinks that Anvancy here has not done a detailled take on HDR through another popular software: Photomatix. I present an example of one HDR that I managed relatively successfully with Photomatix:

http://i35.tinypic.com/2ih8old.jpg



Once you start using them, you will realise that the two methods give widely varied results. It is upto the user to define his parametres and take a call.

@Anvancy: Maybe you can also do a short one on Photomatix as well. Thanks again.

thanks ken for the approval.

i prefer dynamic over matix..it gives results according to my taste.

sunny can give a tut regarding matix.

and here are 2 of my latest work

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3035/3151147882_3828e75249.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3227/3151147152_32ba2f2564.jpg



anvancy

KrishnenduKes
12-31-2008, 06:15 PM
An example from Dynamic:

http://i42.tinypic.com/263bn9j.jpg

And this is what you get from Photomatix from similar treatments:

http://i44.tinypic.com/15czrj6.jpg

Now Anvancy and some others might want my head for such mild treatment with HDRs. But this is just to bring forth the issue that a similar likeness can be achieved from both methods provided we are going the realist's way.

I wonder how Anvancy achieved such amazing contrast on the truck photos!

manav
12-31-2008, 07:37 PM
Thank you so much for this! I was looking around but still not able to get anything for the Mac and Anvancy check PM!

anvancy-(macro analyst)
01-10-2009, 12:15 PM
i thought people were interested in this.i was assuming the response like that of photothread.but it seems otherwise.

Xavier
01-10-2009, 01:15 PM
An awesome tutortial!
Though, my first try at HDR was a shoddy mess. :(

KrishnenduKes
01-10-2009, 06:09 PM
An awesome tutortial!
Though, my first try at HDR was a shoddy mess. :(

Maybe you can show it and anvancy will provide corrective measures...

Xavier
01-26-2009, 10:09 AM
Maybe you can show it and anvancy will provide corrective measures...

Nah! That attempt doesn't even deserve a mention here :P
Anyway, here's my second attempt at HDRI and it turned out to be a lot better than what I expected :)

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3465/3225835868_be754f97f7_b.jpg

anvancy-(macro analyst)
01-26-2009, 10:22 AM
Nah! That attempt doesn't even deserve a mention here :P
Anyway, here's my second attempt at HDRI and it turned out to be a lot better than what I expected :)

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3465/3225835868_be754f97f7_b.jpg

the pic has come dark.up its exposure and brightness to make it more attractive.

Xavier
01-26-2009, 10:24 AM
the pic has come dark.up its exposure and brightness to make it more attractive.

Thanks man. :)
The pic was clicked around 15min after sunset. Anyway, I'll give the exposure settings a shot :)

Xavier
01-26-2009, 10:32 AM
Toyed around with the Exposure/Curves/Brightness settings in PS. Here's the result :

http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p160/xvrdsouza/Bridge12copyTU.jpg

Is this any better?

Xavier
01-26-2009, 07:11 PM
Just found out and realised that an HDR image can be created out of one single shot too, i.e. if you shoot in RAW and convert it into 3 or 5 files with different exposure bias settings. For eg : -2, -1, 0, 1, 2.
This technique will eliminate the camera shake problem faced by people like me who don't own tripods :)

Check this link for a detailed step by step process :)
Link (http://www.boston.com/community/photos/raw/2008/09/photographer_of_the_week_brian_1.html)

nelson_sanjoy
01-26-2009, 08:34 PM
Just found out and realised that an HDR image can be created out of one single shot too, i.e. if you shoot in RAW and convert it into 3 or 5 files with different exposure bias settings. For eg : -2, -1, 0, 1, 2.
This technique will eliminate the camera shake problem faced by people like me who don't own tripods :)

I think that is called pseudo HDRI and not liked by many conservative photographers ...

And also for your photo I think its better you click photos on bright sunlight which will have sharp shadows.

Xavier
01-26-2009, 10:20 PM
Thanks for the advice Nelson, Can't wait to create HDR images shot in good sunlight! :)

As for the single RAW file technique, have been reading a lot on it and the opinion is generally divided. Check this link.
http://www.vanilladays.com/hdr-guide/#onevsthree
This guy says (and shows) that there isn't much difference in the final output using both techniques. :)

anvancy-(macro analyst)
01-27-2009, 04:03 PM
actually pseudo is sort of virtual HDR.

like when u put a single jpg and tell it to tone map.

when u put even a single RAW file in the software,the software virtually calculates the three exposures through the algorithm and gives u complete HDR editing.

for fast things a single raw is useful.or even jpgs are good.for precise detailed,either all increment JPGs or the +-RAW files will do.

nabendubasu
01-28-2009, 09:48 AM
i thought people were interested in this.i was assuming the response like that of photothread.but it seems otherwise.

i am not getting anything near to postquality :o, i just got the hold of the software by mediachance.

shutterbug
01-28-2009, 12:20 PM
I got the mediachance software, but its the trial version.
Here s an attempt from my side.
http://img204.imageshack.us/img204/3206/img1812mediummm5.jpg (http://img204.imageshack.us/my.php?image=img1812mediummm5.jpg)
And a big thanks to Anvancy for this great thread! And also to Ken da for pointing me to this.

prafultripathy
02-09-2009, 01:51 PM
Anvay, I already have your comments about my recent HDR's from the thread in xBhp. Here's re-posting the same HDR's here too


Here's what I did, put the cam in auto mode and just selected 5 exposures from -2.0EV to +2.0EV, with a 1EV difference. And then merged it in Photomatix. The pics where clicked in Auto mode and hence even the ISO settings were at Auto, that lead to so much noise. Here's the result, comments and suggestions please!!!

Click! on the thumbnails to view larger resolution pics.

Chapora Fort, Goa - http://lh6.ggpht.com/_sKr0LfTOf-U/SYdBg5uT1CI/AAAAAAAAFH4/G65qOrldxPw/s144/DSCN2171_2_3_4_5.jpg (http://lh6.ggpht.com/_sKr0LfTOf-U/SYdBg5uT1CI/AAAAAAAAFH4/G65qOrldxPw/s800/DSCN2171_2_3_4_5.jpg)

My Terrace @ 6.30PM - http://lh5.ggpht.com/_sKr0LfTOf-U/SYdBllDbwiI/AAAAAAAAFIA/AXMtaVJUsy8/s144/DSCN2705_6_7_8_9.jpg (http://lh5.ggpht.com/_sKr0LfTOf-U/SYdBllDbwiI/AAAAAAAAFIA/AXMtaVJUsy8/s800/DSCN2705_6_7_8_9.jpg)

Another Terrace @ 7AM - http://lh5.ggpht.com/_sKr0LfTOf-U/SYdBo-Wi4UI/AAAAAAAAFII/Ae8eS3Fztc4/s144/DSC07228_29_30_31_32.jpg (http://lh5.ggpht.com/_sKr0LfTOf-U/SYdBo-Wi4UI/AAAAAAAAFII/Ae8eS3Fztc4/s800/DSC07228_29_30_31_32.jpg)

My Terrace @ 7PM - http://lh3.ggpht.com/_sKr0LfTOf-U/SYdBtUhuJ8I/AAAAAAAAFIU/-VOe_GcenQQ/s144/DSCN2732_3_4_5_6.jpg (http://lh3.ggpht.com/_sKr0LfTOf-U/SYdBtUhuJ8I/AAAAAAAAFIU/-VOe_GcenQQ/s800/DSCN2732_3_4_5_6.jpg)

nelson_sanjoy
03-11-2009, 01:04 AM
Just forayed in to this world of HDRI

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3415/3343983833_76fc6b33dd_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/nelson_sanjoy/3343983833/sizes/l/)

Please suggest me on how to improve on this technique

Thanks in Advance

KrishnenduKes
03-11-2009, 09:12 AM
Just forayed in to this world of HDRI

Please suggest me on how to improve on this technique

Thanks in Advance

Not bad I feel. But then I am a novice too. You should be asking the experts. The experts should make a comment here.

Rockkyyy
03-11-2009, 09:14 AM
Helloo

checkout this profile...

http://www.flickr.com/photos/kanegledhill/page2/

anvancy-(macro analyst)
03-11-2009, 12:00 PM
nelson:a very nice image.

the landscape one i will say.

processing is good.now u didnt mention which software u used.

my advice will be to retouch in LR and PS.add some vibrance in LR.that will improve the image.


anvancy.

nelson_sanjoy
03-11-2009, 07:12 PM
Not bad I feel. But then I am a novice too. You should be asking the experts. The experts should make a comment here.

Thanks Kenda for the encouragement and support. People like you make this a better place.

nelson:a very nice image.

the landscape one i will say.

processing is good.now u didnt mention which software u used.

my advice will be to retouch in LR and PS.add some vibrance in LR.that will improve the image.


anvancy.

Thanks for looking @Avancy - I took 3 Raws using AEB and then photomatix's HDR and tone mapping and then played a bit with curve aand Noise ninja plugin in PS. Probably I may have overdone or underplayed since I am very new to PP.

Pardon my ignorance but what is LR ?

KrishnenduKes
03-11-2009, 11:26 PM
Pardon my ignorance but what is LR ?

LR = Light Room. It is a pretty versatile software. I have not much used it, and I am surviving without it for the moment.

Keep fiddling around with the controls on Photomatix. Save various versions, compare them later side by side. You might get a feel that one is better than the other. That is how I am getting by these days. Total autodidact, like most of us here I guess.

nelson_sanjoy
04-28-2009, 08:12 PM
Now some pseudo HDRs ...

This one is clicked using my very basic P&S
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3129/3482695600_d7d15de0bf_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/nelson_sanjoy/3482695600/sizes/l/)

This one is from my DSLR and Tamron :
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3628/3481879773_b7941b424a_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/nelson_sanjoy/3481879773/sizes/l/)

anvancy-(macro analyst)
04-29-2009, 08:59 AM
Now some pseudo HDRs ...

This one is clicked using my very basic P&S
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3129/3482695600_d7d15de0bf_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/nelson_sanjoy/3482695600/sizes/l/)

This one is from my DSLR and Tamron :
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3628/3481879773_b7941b424a_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/nelson_sanjoy/3481879773/sizes/l/)


now this is more like it!

in the first shot,the processing and ur shooting really brings the essence of the building.its crisp spear structure.

anvancy.

nelson_sanjoy
04-29-2009, 07:41 PM
now this is more like it!

in the first shot,the processing and ur shooting really brings the essence of the building.its crisp spear structure.

anvancy.

Thanks @Avancy - Glad you liked it...

nelson_sanjoy
05-01-2009, 08:39 PM
Some more to bore you ...

These are from my first P&S - Nikon Coolpix S3 (around 5 years old now)
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3308/3490708308_cc70acfa93_b.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3563/3490708658_7d551978ae_b.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3348/3490710080_bc51ccfc9a_b.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3582/3490710576_b42850e346_b.jpg

This is from my DSLR and Tamron
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3637/3490709602_63cdb0ebed_b.jpg

Please feel free to brick-bat me :))

anvancy-(macro analyst)
05-02-2009, 11:03 AM
i like the 2nd one in the series!just run some noise removal to take out the noise thats there in the garage door.

anvancy.

Psycho_McCrazy
05-03-2009, 08:57 PM
I personally do prefer the realistic HDR renderings to the surrealistic ones, and the posted series is quite close to what I would expect from realistic implementation. great work!!!

nelson_sanjoy
05-04-2009, 08:20 PM
i like the 2nd one in the series!just run some noise removal to take out the noise thats there in the garage door.

anvancy.

Sure will do that and post it . Appreciate your suggestions.

I personally do prefer the realistic HDR renderings to the surrealistic ones, and the posted series is quite close to what I would expect from realistic implementation. great work!!!

Even I prefer the realistic HDR's anyday . I beleive anything you do to a pic should enhance the aestheticism and not distort it by over contrasting or over saturating.

Some more pics :))

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3663/3499779068_56372fd6fc_b.jpg

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3312/3499781546_6ae419312b_b.jpg

anvancy-(macro analyst)
06-07-2009, 11:23 AM
nelson the second one is nice.

now just to show u how HDR helps in showing difference in the sky.

for that ofcourse u need clouds and light!i am not here showing my photo or editing skills.just sharing with u some awesome natural changing light effects.

here goes.

on 7th june monsoon had arrived in pune.we witnessed pre monsoon showers.

ill go on by timing.

4:57pm
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3315/3602862240_f28dffbcb5.jpg

the band that you see at the right is actually rain falling!

from that point till the next shot the sky was dark,and it was raining.

6:29pm

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3306/3602049135_90f9eba33a.jpg

things started to clear up.

6:42pm

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3648/3602862984_4b514b33a8.jpg

the sun found out a way to shine.

i then tilted my camera up towards the sky.it came late to me that i should have pointed the camera upwards in the first place.

7:12pm
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3650/3602863452_0439955658.jpg

everyone was going home.

and finally at 7.29pm. Twilight time.

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3594/3602050457_7e5829cd8f.jpg

So you can clearly see..within minutes Life can do a whole 360 degree turn.what u see at one time,is not there the next.

i was busy since my friend was at house.so couldnt do half hr basis comparison.from 5-6.15pm almost it was raining at my place.from 6.20pm onwards things started to change.which u can see here.

hope you enjoyed it.

anvancy.

KrishnenduKes
06-08-2009, 09:45 AM
nelson the second one is nice.

now just to show u how HDR helps in showing difference in the sky.

for that ofcourse u need clouds and light!i am not here showing my photo or editing skills.just sharing with u some awesome natural changing light effects.

here goes.

on 7th june monsoon had arrived in pune.we witnessed pre monsoon showers.

ill go on by timing.

So you can clearly see..within minutes Life can do a whole 360 degree turn.what u see at one time,is not there the next.

i was busy since my friend was at house.so couldnt do half hr basis comparison.from 5-6.15pm almost it was raining at my place.from 6.20pm onwards things started to change.which u can see here.

hope you enjoyed it.

anvancy.

Thanks for keeping the Tutorial alive with various relevant inputs. Yes, it is I think that it is important to realise that changing time changes colours a lot within a short period. Twilight during rainy season is a wonderful time to shoot the skies with the ever shifting hues. And this clearly shows up when one is doing HDRs.

Note: Yes, you should have tilted the camera more skywards in the first place right from the beginning! :D

In Delhi we are still a long way to go before the rains hit us.

anvancy-(macro analyst)
06-08-2009, 09:56 AM
Thanks for keeping the Tutorial alive with various relevant inputs. Yes, it is I think that it is important to realise that changing time changes colours a lot within a short period. Twilight during rainy season is a wonderful time to shoot the skies with the ever shifting hues. And this clearly shows up when one is doing HDRs.

Note: Yes, you should have tilted the camera more skywards in the first place right from the beginning! :D

In Delhi we are still a long way to go before the rains hit us.

as of MED,monsoon has already hit pune.so now things will start to look lovely!

nelson_sanjoy
06-09-2009, 07:51 AM
nelson the second one is nice.

now just to show u how HDR helps in showing difference in the sky.

for that ofcourse u need clouds and light!i am not here showing my photo or editing skills.just sharing with u some awesome natural changing light effects.


Hey thanks a lot @Avancy - keeping a bit busy so sorry to be late .Really appreciate your effort - I have learnt a lot from this thread.Please keep it up.

anvancy-(macro analyst)
06-25-2009, 08:04 PM
ahh..finally june..clouds..many clouds..clouds clouds..but sadly no rain.

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3537/3659402709_17ef03b7ea.jpg

the escort team.

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3572/3659403141_fe66121152.jpg

the main people arriving.

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3297/3659403547_83c2608423.jpg

and scene change.again like i said.constant..not variable change.

and let me make it clear right now.these are not "boosted" saturation colors.these are actual colors or nearly close to it.

CRTs are so very close to accurate when it comes to colors.

anvancy

Xavier
09-14-2009, 02:03 AM
Has anybody tried this out?

http://www.photoacute.com/noise-free-hdr.html

Looks interesting.

niks_devil666
09-29-2009, 10:41 AM
Can you guys do a C&C on these and tell me where I am going wrong

synn
09-29-2009, 11:46 AM
All of them are nicely framed, but it seems like the first three were metered wrongly. Either that or during tone mapping, you didn't give enough emphasis to the blacks. Hence, they look a bit bleached out.

Very nice otherwise. All 4 shots have great potential.

Xavier
09-29-2009, 05:32 PM
Can you guys do a C&C on these and tell me where I am going wrong

These are pretty good! Loved the 4th one especially. These are IMO HDRs, the way it should be.

niks_devil666
09-30-2009, 01:06 AM
All of them are nicely framed, but it seems like the first three were metered wrongly. Either that or during tone mapping, you didn't give enough emphasis to the blacks. Hence, they look a bit bleached out.

Very nice otherwise. All 4 shots have great potential.
ok , I don't know how to emphasize on blacks but just move the sliders and wait till it looks good. any suggested reads?

@synn & xavier : thanks for the c&c

Xavier
09-30-2009, 09:10 AM
ok , I don't know how to emphasize on blacks but just move the sliders and wait till it looks good. any suggested reads?

@synn & xavier : thanks for the c&c

Lightroom has a separate slider for Blacks which is very useful.

Cyclops
04-29-2010, 11:47 PM
Hi,

Sorry to barge in, but I hope this might help. This is not a photo, but a page on steps to create HDRs. Please copy paste the link in a new browser.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/wattsbw2004/3813241017/sizes/o/

If its of no help, please don't complain or bash me. ;)

KrishnenduKes
04-30-2010, 10:12 AM
Hi,

Sorry to barge in, but I hope this might help. This is not a photo, but a page on steps to create HDRs. Please copy paste the link in a new browser.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/wattsbw2004/3813241017/sizes/o/

If its of no help, please don't complain or bash me. ;)

Post moved to appropriate section.