Your Comments are my Fuel to Run

[TheShutterbug]

No idea about photography still. Just started learning.....your comments r my fuel to run .....

Here i go


http://img32.imageshack.us/img32/4404/18049096.jpg (http://img32.imageshack.us/i/18049096.jpg/)

http://img223.imageshack.us/img223/6329/32437662.jpg (http://img223.imageshack.us/i/32437662.jpg/)

http://img132.imageshack.us/img132/4302/96757965.jpg (http://img132.imageshack.us/i/96757965.jpg/)

[KrishnenduKes]

Photo Critique Approved

I liked the idea behind the first photograph. There is a conscious effort of being creative. I did not find any particular point of interest in the 2nd photograph. The 3rd one is just "nice". It is pretty good... but there is something missing.

[becauseofb]

I apologize in the start if the critique is a little harsh...

Composition-wise the first picture is the best. It has a diagonal line which the eye follows and the bokeh is working well.. however a slightly more sharper front object wouldve been great. The colors have come out well.

The second picture is a good attempt at going macro... however one gets confused as the eye doesnt have much to travel and gets distracted by the shiny thing on the right. I think a closer crop would look better.

The third picture is a good sight noticed and captured. I do not know howmuch post processing has been done, but the probably the saturation of the green has made the sky very pale and the details seem to be lost.

[Xavier]

^+1 to that.

Also, the details look smudged on the last photograph.
The 1st one is the best by a mile.

[arijit]

the first one looks great...

the second one is nice concept but not that impressive, probably because of no such significance of the 'R' towards any other object in the photo. if you were trying to get 'racer' with the keys on table, the bokeh is so strong that the concept is missed!! the font of 'R' is not of any remarkable presence either.
i suggest a PS PP on it. drop the vibrance of the remaining pic except the 'R'. i suppose the photo value will boost up somewhat with it.

the third pic was shot in low light on auto smart/auto mode i think. the loss of details is evident. try going for B&W with some good contrast management.

apart from this...really liked your logo??? self designed?

[TheShutterbug]

@ becauseofb, Xavier, arijit

I really appreciate all of your good effort to make me understand the real photography. I definitely will try my level best to improve fast.

I am reading again n again all of ur comments. Will come up with new shot soon.

Arijith, yes thats my copyright logo. and self designed :)

[arijit]

well as i said for the second foto...i dont think i was very clear. so i did some fast impulsive and not so fine editing of your foto...just to convey my idea in a better manner..heres it...hope you find a better idea from this!!!
http://i956.photobucket.com/albums/ae48/fotuzlab/random/32437662.jpg

what i have turned complete B&W could be better with synchronous low vibrance but as i said i didnt pay much time on it...sry for that!!
n thats a nice logo:)

n n n...i suppose even i am open to c&c now...lolz:):)

[TheShutterbug]

Arijit,

Thanks for ur positive comments on logo. And as i dont' know much yet ...on my eyes ur editing looks better

Doing practice ....reading a lot ....lets see how long it takes at least to click decent pics.

Again ...appreciate your support

[TheShutterbug]

I started missing this year.....:(

http://img194.imageshack.us/img194/6528/dsc03579copy.jpg