PDA

View Full Version : Nikon D3100


ashishtamhane
02-05-2012, 09:58 AM
After exactly 10 months and 5 days of using my first DSLR, the Nikon D3100, I think I can write my views on it. The purpose behind writing this review after such a long time from buying the camera is pretty simple: I myself knew any features of it.


The D3100 is a small camera. If anyone has large hands then I feel it may pass off as a bridge camera to an unsuspecting person. It is pretty well built too. Buttons operate with a good feedback, the kit lens zooms with a nice smooth action and the mirror slapping sound is evident only when you listen to it on purpose.


For an amateur like me the biggest help was from the (?) button. This button helps to explain each and every feature of the camera when you press it. For example with the Auto-Focus mode on AF-C, pressing the (?) button displays what it does and generally when that mode should be used. Of course the Manual is always there but it sure helps when you have such a feature in the camera.


I am particularly amazed by the amount of technology that they have managed to pack in this small body. There is the AF-C mode with 3d-Tracking. I remember having a conversation with Cyclops earlier on the same issue. Cyclops had shot a very sharp photo of a bird taking-off from a pond. I asked him if he had shot that with the Continuous tracking mode to which he replied that there was no such mode in his camera, an old Nikon D90, and that he had used Manual Focus to achieve the feat.


Development is cool!

Metering is quite predictable which is good, and since I use the ETTR method I usually overexpose almost all of my shots by +0.7 EV. Results of the shots are excellent with the 14 MP sensor giving me the ability to crop my photos, though I intent to reduce this practice since I think it’s an excuse to not framing the shot properly.


One thing I loved with the kit 18-55mm was the superb Macro capability. When you hold the camera properly it gives fantastic results. At the Wide-angle side too the lens focuses very close.


I have only had the kit 18-55mm lens with me until this time, which is excellent for my abilities buy I intent to spoil myself with the 50mm f/1.8 now. I have heard a lot of people and also read that that lens is very sharp, so I would like to experience this.


Until now I have not used the video capability ever. It seems excellent though.


What I would like to have in the body:


Just one thing: I think they should have included the Shot Bracketing feature in it. It would have given me the ability to use HDR photography.


Next I will try to give my views on this body coupled with the 50mm but I guess that will be more a review of the lens.

anvancy-(macro analyst)
02-06-2012, 11:57 AM
I think synn can help in the Nikon department.

Hope you are enjoying your camera.

Anvancy

Cyclops
02-06-2012, 06:31 PM
Good review, Ashish!

Btw, I don't have a D90, mine is a D40 the very predecessor of you D3100 with less features & 6MP only! :D

I'm still telling you very frankly as a friend to save and get the 50mm f/1.8G rather than the 50mm f/1.8D... Same level of sharpness & build quality, except that it has the AF-S SWM that will work wonders on the lower level DSLR bodies like D40, D40x, D60, D3000, D3100, D5000 & D5100.

Yes, I to miss the shot bracketing features that are already available on the lowest Canon DSLRs. It would be very helpful for taking HDRIs in tricky situations as I don't usually carry a tripod. Canon is better in feature department, but Nikon scores on sensor & built quality.

ashishtamhane
02-06-2012, 06:44 PM
Hope you are enjoying your camera.


Good review, Ashish!

Btw, I don't have a D90, mine is a D40 the very predecessor of you D3100 with less features & 6MP only! :D

I'm still telling you very frankly as a friend to save and get the 50mm f/1.8G rather than the 50mm f/1.8D... Same level of sharpness & build quality, except that it has the AF-S SWM that will work wonders on the lower level DSLR bodies like D40, D40x, D60, D3000, D3100, D5000 & D5100.


Thanks!

Goofed up in the model number there!

13K for a lens is simply out of question right now. Too darn expensive. Besides my family don't understand how can a lens be worth that much! Either i will have to earn that lens from my own salary, which i will get after i get a job after 1.5 years (3rd semester out of 6 going on now) or get that 'D' version now.

Cyclops
02-06-2012, 07:01 PM
13K for a lens is simply out of question right now. Too darn expensive. Besides my family don't understand how can a lens be worth that much! Either i will have to earn that lens from my own salary, which i will get after i get a job after 1.5 years (3rd semester out of 6 going on now) or get that 'D' version now.

Either save for it or get it on loan from family/friend etc. Or, if you want D, then come here, I'll give it to you. I'm fed up of it not AF-S when I want it the most. This weekend, I'm shooting an engagement with D80 & 50mm f/1.8D which does AF! :D

robin234
02-06-2012, 07:21 PM
I'm logging in after full whole month of absence from here.

anyway ,get 35mm 1.8 G .

synn
02-06-2012, 08:50 PM
50 1.8D will frustrate you to no end. That lens is just not built for manual focus. Save up, get the 1.8G. Else, get an old AiS lens built for MF.

The 35 1.8G that robin mentioned will give you the FoV of 50 on an FX body. Depends on what your preferences are. Do you like the FoV of your kit lens at 35mm or at 50mm?

Cyclops
02-06-2012, 09:49 PM
50 1.8D will frustrate you to no end. That lens is just not built for manual focus. Save up, get the 1.8G. Else, get an old AiS lens built for MF.

Very true that! I know it & its the least used piece of my equipment!

The 35 1.8G that robin mentioned will give you the FoV of 50 on an FX body. Depends on what your preferences are. Do you like the FoV of your kit lens at 35mm or at 50mm?

Its a FoV of 50mm on a DX body! Not the other way! :p

I would suggest either the 35 f/1.8G for 11-13k or 50 f/1.8G for 13-15K! Not much of a difference in price, if you ask me! Grey market would give a good deal, if searched properly!

synn
02-07-2012, 07:23 AM
Yep, sorry. I really shouldn't be posting online after 6 beers :D

ashishtamhane
02-07-2012, 03:34 PM
anyway ,get 35mm 1.8 G .

50 1.8D will frustrate you to no end.

Do you like the FoV of your kit lens at 35mm or at 50mm?

Actually given a choice between the FOV of 35mm and 50mm, i would opt for the 35mm. Its just that the 50mm D version is relatively cheap that i am thinking of it.

I would in-fact love the 35mm AF-S more then the 50mm AF-S but it is expensive for me right now.


Grey market would give a good deal, if searched properly!

I have not considered that option till now and frankly, don't have any experience in that too.

Cyclops
02-07-2012, 06:11 PM
I have not considered that option till now and frankly, don't have any experience in that too.

Everything I've except myself, is mostly grey market! :p Can't afford anything else, given the cost of a bill & warranty! :( So long, all are working without a glitch, except me of course! :D

ashishtamhane
02-07-2012, 07:05 PM
Everything I've except myself, is mostly grey market! :p Can't afford anything else, given the cost of a bill & warranty! :( So long, all are working without a glitch, except me of course! :D

How much difference is there in the prices?

The 35mm AF-S retails for 12775/- INR on Flipkart.com

Cyclops
02-07-2012, 09:07 PM
How much difference is there in the prices?

The 35mm AF-S retails for 12775/- INR on Flipkart.com

Last time I heard from grey market source is 11200/- Was planning to get it when some other emergency got hold of that cash!

ashishtamhane
02-07-2012, 10:51 PM
Last time I heard from grey market source is 11200/- Was planning to get it when some other emergency got hold of that cash!

But that's surely not a great difference in the price. For 1500/- INR extra you will get a warranty and peace of mind. :confused:

robin234
02-07-2012, 11:46 PM
get the stuff with warranty .

Cyclops
02-08-2012, 09:02 AM
But that's surely not a great difference in the price. For 1500/- INR extra you will get a warranty and peace of mind. :confused:

Yes, not much of a difference for most, but unfortunately for me it does!

get the stuff with warranty .

Yea, if you got the dough, then better go for stuff with warranty, is what I would say!

Bibudesh
02-08-2012, 02:40 PM
You may need to talk to devaiah regarding 35mm. He had back focussin issues on his D90, the same lens was working wonders on my D300 ..
Seems there was some version mismatch between D90 and the 35mm lens.

synn
02-08-2012, 02:59 PM
Probably an issue with that particular copy of the lens. Your D300 has microadjust feature (Assuming that you used that), the D90 doesn't.

sabret00the
04-07-2012, 08:29 AM
Has anyone done the firmware upgrade?

http://support.nikonusa.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/17128/~/d3100-firmware%3A-a%2Fb%3A1.01

I'm still evaluating the benefits of doing this. BTW bracketing has still not been included.

ashishtamhane
04-07-2012, 11:20 PM
Has anyone done the firmware upgrade?

http://support.nikonusa.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/17128/~/d3100-firmware%3A-a%2Fb%3A1.01

I'm still evaluating the benefits of doing this. BTW bracketing has still not been included.

Not me yet!

KrishnenduKes
04-09-2012, 08:07 AM
You may need to talk to devaiah regarding 35mm. He had back focussin issues on his D90, the same lens was working wonders on my D300 ..
Seems there was some version mismatch between D90 and the 35mm lens.

Probably an issue with that particular copy of the lens. Your D300 has microadjust feature (Assuming that you used that), the D90 doesn't.

Aren't you supposed to calibrate if you have back focussing of front focussing issues?

synn
04-09-2012, 10:26 AM
Major physical issues, yes. But sometimes, it's just the software that's causing the issues (And these are usually only minor). Microadjust helps compensate for this.